High Court sides with secrecy: how Britain’s Afghanistan Inquiry has been predictably dragged further into the shadows in the name of ‘National Security’ - AOAV

High Court Upholds Secrecy in Afghanistan Inquiry

The High Court's ruling to continue the Afghanistan Inquiry under a dual closed-material procedure represents a win for secrecy over transparency. Key evidence regarding alleged Special Forces war crimes will stay hidden from the public eye.

Legal Framework and Procedures

On 3 November 2025, the High Court authorized a hybrid closed-material approach. National security information will be managed under the Justice and Security Act 2013, while other sensitive evidence related to witness safety will be handled in closed sessions through the court’s inherent jurisdiction. Special advocates will represent parties excluded from these sessions.

Court’s Reasoning and Implications

“It is not merely important but fundamental that justice be seen to be done,”

— Lord Hewart’s famous dictum from Sussex Justices, emphasizing the need for visible justice.

The Court clarified that the Justice and Security Act governs national-security issues, while inherent jurisdiction covers other harms to avoid conflicting procedures. Despite these safeguards, the ruling signifies a further step away from openness in an inquiry already delayed.

Consequences for Public Access

Author's summary: The High Court's ruling deepens secrecy in the Afghanistan Inquiry, prioritizing national security over public scrutiny and limiting access to critical evidence about alleged war crimes.

more

Action on Armed Violence - AOAV Action on Armed Violence - AOAV — 2025-11-04

More News